SGA president Calvin Stafford and SGA adviser Laura Knotts went to a board meeting in Baton Rouge to get approval for the Student Activity Support Fee referendum. The referendum was approved on Feb. 26 and will go to the students for a vote in April.
This referendum will consolidate the 18 fees under the Student Assessed Fee into one fee and will add $60 to the cost of the fee.
Students already pay $242.45 a semester under the Student Assessed fee. Students will be paying $302.45 a semester if the referendum passes.
With the fee increase, this sets aside money to benefit any RSO and on-campus service. They will get no less than what they are initially supposed to get, but now have the chance to get more money to support their activities by submitting a budget to a committee of students.
According to Knotts, this can double the money they will hold because they are not dropping any current support that the students previously wanted.
“Not only would band, spirit groups, the library and all of the people who are currently getting money still get money, we would have an additional pool to pull from,” Knotts said. “They will be able to submit a very detailed budget to a committee. The vice president will be on it, but the voting comes from students. It is students deciding what to do with student money.”
Stafford hinted to the possibility of another athletic referendum in the future.
“A couple of board members came up to me afterwards and said we did a really good job and they’re really proud,” said Stafford. “They actually encouraged us to do an athletic referendum, but that won’t be happening. At least not now.”
Referendum meetings took place Feb. 27 and 28 in the conference room. During these meetings, each senator, one by one, explained the referendum to Stafford as though he knew nothing about it, “just like any other student since the students wouldn’t know anything about it.”
After the referendum meeting, the senate went to the SUB and around campus to talk to students and explain to them the benefits of the referendum.
According to Stafford, “most people won’t have an idea of what [the referendum] really means,” and they will be doing something similar every week.
Stafford said that he thinks in the past the student body and the senate have not completely understood the referendum. He wants to make sure that his senate has a full understanding and can properly inform the student body.
“The majority of the schools in our system are putting referendums up for vote this semester,” Knotts said. “Ours was by far the least expensive of any of the referendums being put together.”
Cebus • Mar 13, 2013 at 6:32 pm
Dewane,
On the off chance that you are the one student a ulm.edu search of that first name produced, let me just say that in all of my years at ULM, I have never seen a Hawkeye employee “begging people” to pick up a hawkeye. But I have seen the photo you took of yourself with your cell phone in a public bathroom.
Dewayne • Mar 11, 2013 at 9:03 pm
Perhaps we should cut some of the money that student publications receives. It’s not like anyone reads the Hawkeye anyways. In fact, it’s such a load of crap that they have to walk around practically begging people to take one. It’s such a shame that so many ignorant students attend ULM. Intelligent and well informed students understand that student fees cannot be used to fund teacher salaries. If you want to save more jobs, don’t complain about there being a ten percent increase in tuition! If anything is a joke it’s the ULM Hawkeye! As an involved student, I student the referendum! Thanks!!
Garrett • Mar 6, 2013 at 10:50 am
We have to deal with this controversial referendum dreamed up by the SGA every Spring semester. The last two have failed to pass, and I believe this one should endure the same fate. This is a 24.7% increase in this fee. All of this coming at a time when all of LA education is suffering large budget cuts, and teachers are being cut daily to save dollars. The only way I would support a $60 increase per semester is if this money goes towards keeping teachers and classes. A million bucks a year is much better spent in this way than having folks vote on everywhere except education they want money to go. Once again the SGA fails to fight for the best interests of the students of a UNIVERSITY. [Editor’s Note: this is not Garrett Boyte, News Editor for the Hawkeye. The Hawkeye’s policy prohibits employees from commenting on web stories. Thank you. -GB]
What a Joke • Mar 6, 2013 at 9:39 am
What bothers me is that the president is bragging about getting a pat on the back by the board for raising our fees. It’d be nice if someone from the SGA actually represented the students’ interests for a change, rather than spending a career trying to get high-fives from the administration.
Cebus • Mar 5, 2013 at 10:55 pm
Why would the board members suggest an athletic referendum? Which board members in particular?