Last month, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order classifying burning the American flag as a crime, assigning one year of jail time to the offense. Recently, concerns about patriotism, respect and national values have been raised. Since learning about this new development, I have felt more supportive of my president. This was a decision made on behalf of many Americans who value upholding the country’s principles.
“I am neither for nor against the constitutional protection of flag burning,” an anonymous student said. “However, there is a proper way to burn the US flag according to the flag code, and it is disrespectful to the country to go against it.”
One could argue that this is a violation of our First Amendment right, which states that flag burning is a protected form of political expression. On the other hand, the idea of a right that allows such an action may seem contradictory. In my opinion, this is a serious act that should have consequences.
“You burn a flag, you get one year in jail,” Trump said during the signing of this executive order. “You don’t get ten years; you don’t get one month.”
I believe one year is sufficient to establish the consequences. It will penalize those who burn the flag illegally and demonstrate that this country’s traditions are taken seriously. Individuals affected may consider questions such as: Will I be able to get a job with this offense on my record? Who will support my family during my incarceration? And: Is it worth facing jail for a year?
When people have their lives, reputations and responsibilities to protect, they may be less likely to act out. Except for respectful flag retirement ceremonies, flag burning as a form of political expression is not only controversial, but completely disrespectful. Peaceful protest is a right, but respect for national traditions and for veterans who have served remains more important than proving a point about one’s political beliefs.
Caleb Baham • Sep 9, 2025 at 1:56 pm
I propose classifying disrespecting our intelligence as a crime, assigning one year of jail time to the offense. I believe one year is sufficient to establish the consequences. It will penalize those who insult our intelligence illegally and demonstrate that this country’s editorial traditions are taken seriously. When guest writers have their lives, reputations and responsibilities to protect, they may be less likely to act out. Freedom of the press is a right, but respect for editorial traditions and journalists remains more important than proving a point about one’s political beliefs.