I refer to the recently reported statements of University of Louisiana at Monroe’s SGA president Brook Sebren (“ULM students vote against referendum to raise fees”).
Sebren claimed that if students voted against the referendum it was because they “only saw a number,” and were unable to “grasp the big picture.”
I feel that his statements are telling of his views of students.
If we do not support the SGA’s financial proposals, it must be because we are so buried under the weight of our own myopic ignorance that we lack the capacity for comprehension of the “complexities of budgets.”
The rhetoric to induce sympathy for the referendum, that ULM’s athletic budget is lowest among its Football Bowl Subdivision, is indicative of the spending race that characterizes off-track budgeting priorities.
What wasn’t revealed is that on a per capita basis, athletic spending in the Sunbelt is already four times more than academic spending, and athletic budgets have slowly expanded over the years while academic spending has stagnated.
It is unacceptable to belittle the intelligence of the studentry that voted down a proposal to essentially raise their tuition in order to expand the athletic budget by 25 percent, when our academic programs continue to disintegrate due to budget cuts.
I voted no to the referendum because I will always first consider the impact on academics of any new spending measures.
Academic programs historically and demonstrably do very well when they are properly funded (and respected). Sadly, the same is not true of sports programs.
Joseph Roberts
Senior at ULM
(Original Letter to the Editor was published on the News Star’s website on April 26, 2011.